User interfaces for mutually exclusive three dimensional flying spaces

ABSTRACT

Boundary information associated with a three-dimensional (3D) flying space is obtained, including a boundary of the 3D flying space. Location information associated with an aircraft is obtained, including a location of the aircraft. Information is presented based at least in part on the boundary information associated with the 3D flying space and the location information associated with the aircraft, including by presenting, in a display, the boundary of the 3D flying space and an avatar representing the aircraft at the location of the aircraft.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

New types of aircraft are being developed for use by relativelyinexperienced pilots (e.g., without a pilot's license and/or withoutextensive flight training). New user interfaces to provide informationto such inexperienced pilots during flight would be desirable, forexample, because the aircraft is operating in a new and/or differentmanner compared to existing aircraft for the ease and/or benefit ofrelatively inexperienced pilots. The user interface may provide orotherwise present information which helps the pilot to better understandhow the aircraft operates (e.g., in the new and/or different ways) andhave a better and/or more informed flight experience.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the followingdetailed description and the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of three-dimensional (3D)flying spaces associated with a permitted route.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating embodiments of cross-sectional areasassociated with a three-dimensional (3D) flying space.

FIG. 3A is a diagram illustrating a top view of an embodiment ofthree-dimensional (3D) flying spaces associated with layers.

FIG. 3B is a diagram illustrating a side view of an embodiment ofthree-dimensional (3D) flying spaces associated with layers.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process to presentinformation associated with a three-dimensional (3D) flying space.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of blocks in anaircraft associated with presenting information based at least in parton boundary information associated with a three-dimensional (3D) flyingspace and location information associated with the aircraft.

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a display which isconfigured to display an aircraft's position relative to the boundariesof a three-dimensional (3D) flying space.

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a display showing atop view of an aircraft's position relative to the boundaries of athree-dimensional (3D) flying space.

FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of arrow indicators,speakers, and hand controls which are used to present information.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process to presentinformation using a display.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process topresent information using a speaker, including a distance between theboundary of a three-dimensional (3D) flying space and the location of anaircraft.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process topresent information using a speaker, including a correction direction.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process topresent information using a speaker, including a correction direction.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as aprocess; an apparatus; a system; a composition of matter; a computerprogram product embodied on a computer readable storage medium; and/or aprocessor, such as a processor configured to execute instructions storedon and/or provided by a memory coupled to the processor. In thisspecification, these implementations, or any other form that theinvention may take, may be referred to as techniques. In general, theorder of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within thescope of the invention. Unless stated otherwise, a component such as aprocessor or a memory described as being configured to perform a taskmay be implemented as a general component that is temporarily configuredto perform the task at a given time or a specific component that ismanufactured to perform the task. As used herein, the term ‘processor’refers to one or more devices, circuits, and/or processing coresconfigured to process data, such as computer program instructions.

A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention isprovided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate theprinciples of the invention. The invention is described in connectionwith such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to anyembodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims andthe invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications andequivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the followingdescription in order to provide a thorough understanding of theinvention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and theinvention may be practiced according to the claims without some or allof these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technicalmaterial that is known in the technical fields related to the inventionhas not been described in detail so that the invention is notunnecessarily obscured.

Various embodiments of user interfaces and/or techniques to presentinformation associated with a three-dimensional (3D) flying space and/orposition or location information associated with the aircraft (e.g.,where the aircraft is automatically constrained or otherwise configuredto stay within its 3D flying space, even if the pilot attempts to leavethe 3D flying space) are described herein. First, some examples of 3Dflying spaces are described. Then, various embodiments of userinterfaces and/or techniques to present information associated with such3D flying spaces are described.

In the example shown, a person can get on an aircraft and take a tour ofsights on the San Francisco Bay and along the San Francisco waterfront.For example, the person may first watch a safety video which includesinstructions on how to fly the aircraft and is then permitted to rent anaircraft. In one example, the aircraft has floats (e.g., so that theaircraft is buoyant on water) and the pilot performs a vertical takeofffrom water.

The pilot guides their plane so that it enters the first 3D flying space(100) at the entrance (102) to that permitted route. Using the controlsand/or input devices of the aircraft (e.g., a joystick), the pilot ispermitted to fly their aircraft within the three-dimensional spacedefined by 3D flying space 100 as desired but is not permitted todeviate from the permitted path or route shown. For example, some typesof aircraft can hover in place and the pilot may (if desired) stop alongthe route or path (e.g., with the aircraft hovering in-air) to takepictures of iconic and/or scenic San Francisco landmarks. Alternatively,they can fly along the first 3D flying space (100) as fast or as slow asthey want without stopping.

A more formal way of describing this type of 3D flying space is to saythat it includes at least one entrance and exit and that the length(i.e., the distance measured from the entrance to the exit) is thelargest dimension compared to a height or a width (e.g., associated witha cross-sectional area).

As an example of how the pilot is not permitted to steer or otherwiseguide the aircraft outside of a 3D flying space, suppose that the pilotis in straight section 104 of 3D flying space 100. To fly through thisstraight section 104, the pilot will push their joystick forward (e.g.,assuming the input device is a joystick). If the pilot is not payingattention and keeps pushing the joystick forward when the straightsection ends and 3D flying space 100 begins to turn to the pilot's rightat bend 108, the aircraft will not permit the pilot to steer orotherwise guide the aircraft outside of the permitted path or routecorresponding to 3D flying space 100 shown here. In this example, thepilot's instruction (in this example, to fly straight forward eventhough the permitted route turns) would be interpreted or handled by theaircraft in the following manner. Since the pilot's desired direction offlight (e.g., corresponding to path or trajectory 106) is not completelyorthogonal to bend 108, the aircraft will continue to move (e.g., asopposed to stopping and hovering midair), but will turn so that theaircraft follows bend 108 and will not fly along forward path ortrajectory 106, even though the pilot is holding the joystick forward.In contrast, other types of aircraft (e.g., which have no understandingof a 3D flying space and/or which are not configured to respect theboundaries defined by a 3D flying space) would obey the pilot's inputand those aircraft would continue on the forward path or trajectory(106) which deviates from the bend (108) in 3D flying space 100.

In 3D flying space 100 shown here, the selected route or path may behelpful in preventing pilots from flying into more dangerous and/orrestricted areas. For example, the winds west of the Golden Gate Bridgemay be significantly stronger than the winds east of the bridge, makingflying much more difficult in that area. In this example, the pilots maybe relatively inexperienced and/or tourists unfamiliar with the area andso a 3D flying space or permitted path which keeps an aircraft east ofthe Golden Gate Bridge (as shown here) will prevent the pilot andaircraft from entering more dangerous areas. Similarly, the exemplary 3Dflying space shown here keeps the pilot and aircraft from enteringprotected airspaces associated with the Oakland or San Franciscoairports.

A 3D flying space also helps to prevent collisions between two aircraft.For example, suppose a second pilot came along and wanted to take thesame tour as the first pilot. The second pilot and their aircraft wouldbe assigned to the second 3D flying space (110). Accordingly, they wouldenter the second entrance (112) associated with the second 3D flyingspace (110). Even if the first pilot is very slow (e.g., making manystops along the way), the second pilot will not run into the firstpilot's aircraft because the first 3D flying space (100) and the second3D flying space (110) do not intersect or otherwise overlap. Rather, thetwo permitted paths run parallel to each other from the entrances (102and 112) all the way to the exits (114 and 116).

The following figure shows some exemplary cross-sectional areasassociated with 3D flying space 100 and 110.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating embodiments of cross-sectional areasassociated with a three-dimensional (3D) flying space. In someembodiments, 3D flying spaces 100 and 110 in FIG. 1 have cross-sectionalareas as shown here.

Cross-sectional area 200 shows an example where a 3D flying space has anelliptical cross-sectional area. Aircraft 202 shows an example of anaircraft which is constrained or otherwise configured to remain withinthe boundaries of a 3D flying space, including cross-sectional area 200,even if the pilot indicates, via the controls or input devices, thatthey want to fly outside of cross-sectional area 200. The pilot ispermitted to steer or otherwise move the aircraft within cross-sectionalarea 200, so long as the plane does not move or otherwise fly beyond theboundary associated with cross-sectional area 200. For example, if thepilot was hovering and wanted to move upwards, that would be permittedso long as aircraft 202 does not move beyond the boundary associatedwith cross-sectional area 200. Otherwise, the pilot's input would beignored (e.g., as the aircraft got closer to a top boundary, theaircraft would slow to a stop, even if/while an up-down thumbwheel usedto control attitude were still being pushed up).

Generally speaking, user interfaces and/or techniques to presentinformation (e.g., to show the boundaries of the 3D flying space, theaircraft's position within the 3D flying space, etc.) are independent ofthe aircraft's (e.g., automated) response and/or intervention to keepthe aircraft within the 3D flying space. For example, a user interfacemay present a warning that the aircraft is getting too close to theboundary of the 3D flying space at a first distance from the boundary,but may not actually take action in response to the aircraft's proximityto the boundary until the aircraft is closer (e.g., by automaticallyslowing down and stopping the aircraft before it crosses the boundary ofthe 3D flying space, by automatically turning the aircraft to follow aturn in a path, etc.). To put it another way, the distance (e.g., fromthe boundary of a 3D flying space) at which a warning message ornotification is displayed by a user interface is not necessarily thesame as the distance (e.g., again from the boundary of a 3D flyingspace) at which the aircraft intervenes and/or ignores a pilot's inputin order to keep the aircraft within the 3D flying space. For example,by displaying or issuing a warning sooner before any intervention isperformed may give the pilot an opportunity to correct the aircraft'spath or trajectory before the aircraft begins to ignore the pilot'sinstruction(s) and/or otherwise intervene to keep the aircraft in the 3Dflying space.

Cross-sectional area 204 shows an example where a 3D flying space has arectangular cross-sectional area. As before, aircraft 206 is permittedto move about within cross-sectional area 204 per the input of the pilot(e.g., via a joystick, control, or other input device), so long as thoseinstructions would not cause aircraft 206 to move beyond the boundariesof cross-sectional area 204. Elliptical cross section 200 andrectangular cross section 204 are merely two examples and any type ofcross-sectional area or 3D flying space in general may be used.

In some embodiments, a cross-sectional dimension of a 3D flying space(e.g., radius, height, width, etc.) is based at least in part on thepotential obstacles a pilot may encounter and would like to avoid. Forexample, on the San Francisco Bay where there are many different typesof ships, a 3D flying space (e.g., 200 or 204) could be wide enough toavoid large tanker vessels or cargo containers and/or high enough toavoid sailboat masts. Naturally, whatever the dimensions, the 3D flyingspace would still be mutually exclusive and constructed to avoid areasof danger and/or concern.

In some embodiments, a 3D flying space is expressed in an efficientmanner which reduces an amount of storage used (e.g., on an aircraftwhich stores the 3D flying space) and/or bandwidth consumed (e.g., ifthe 3D flying space is sent from and/or assigned by an assignor and theinformation is exchanged over some (e.g., wireless) network). In oneexample, a 3D flying space is broken up into one or more segments (i.e.,the 3D flying space is defined piecewise) and each segment is expressedor otherwise represented using: (1) a center path (e.g., an imaginaryline in the center of the cross section of the 3D flying space) and (2)a cross section about the center path.

In one example of the center path, suppose that the 3D flying spaceincludes different segment types (e.g., some combination of linearsegments and curved segments). A first segment may have a center pathdefined as a line from (e.g., GPS) coordinates (a, b) to (e.g., GPS)coordinates (c, d). Then, the next segment has a center path which iscircular from coordinates (e, f) to (g, h) with a radius of 200 meters.

In one example of the cross section, the cross section may include aspecification or selection of a shape type from one of several possibleor permitted shapes (e.g., circle, ellipse, rectangle, etc.) withdefined parameters that are relevant for that shape type (e.g., heightand width for rectangular cross sections, radius for circular crosssections, etc.).

In some embodiments, there are “gaps” between adjacent or successivesegments of a 3D flying space and interpolation is performed on-boardthe aircraft to determine the boundaries of the 3D flying space betweenthe (e.g., explicitly and/or piecewise-defined) segments. Naturally, theinterpolation is performed in a manner that ensures the 3D flying spacesare mutually exclusive. Using on-board interpolation may help to furtherimprove the efficient representation of a 3D flying space (e.g., so thatstorage space and/or bandwidth consumption is further reduced).

In a similar approach, in some embodiments, segments are touching and/orcontiguous but smoothing is performed where adjacent or successivesegments meet. For example, suppose that the 3D flying space may bedefined as piecewise, overlapping linear segments where on-boardsmoothing is performed so that the 3D flying space has rounded turns(e.g., for a smoother and/or more natural flying experience) instead ofsharp, abrupt turns where the linear segments join each other. This maysupport an efficient manner in which to represent or otherwise store a3D flying space while also supporting or otherwise enabling a smootherand/or more natural flying experience.

Returning to FIG. 1, for simplicity and ease of explanation, theexemplary 3D flying spaces shown there (100 and 110) each have a singleentrance (102 and 112, respectively) and a single exit (114 and 116,respectively). In some embodiments, a 3D flying space has multipleentrances and/or exits. For example, if 3D flying spaces 100 and 110were modified as such, this would permit people to land and get out ofthe aircraft at various spots of interest (e.g., Fisherman's Wharf, nearthe Golden Gate Bridge, on Angel Island, etc.) instead of being forcedto remain in the aircraft for the entire ride. In some embodiments, the(e.g., additional) entrances and exits are routed in 3D space so thatthey do not overlap or otherwise intersect with other 3D flying spacesassociated with other pilots and/or other aircraft. In some embodiments,there is a single, bidirectional entrance and exit (e.g., instead ofhaving a dedicated, unidirectional entrance like entrances 102 and 112and a dedicated, unidirectional exit like exits 114 and 116) for morecompact routing and/or efficient use of (air)space.

As will be described in more detail below, a 3D flying space is virtualand it is not necessary to have infrastructure and/or devices in placein order for a 3D flying space to be defined and/or respected. Forexample, with this technique, it is not necessary for some physicaldevice to be present or otherwise installed to (as an example) indicateor assign a 3D flying space to a particular aircraft. Rather, as will bedescribed in more detail below, the aircraft has a sense of its locationin the air and where the boundaries of the 3D flying space are. Both ofthese things enable the aircraft to stay within a 3D flying space,including by ignoring pilot input as/if needed.

In some embodiments, a 3D flying space is dynamic and/or temporal (e.g.,lasting only for some time and not forever). For example, when the windson the San Francisco Bay are strong, it may be desirable to have alarger distance between two adjacent 3D flying spaces. In one example,each morning, before people are permitted to take the aircraft out alongthe permitted routes, the distance between two adjacent 3D flying spacesis set according to the weather (e.g., with a larger separation if thewinds are strong). To accommodate the larger separations, the number of3D flying spaces may be decreased.

In the example of FIG. 1, the 3D flying spaces are unidirectional pathsor routes with permitted directions of flight (i.e., they are one-way).That is, the aircraft are, under normal conditions where there is noemergency, only permitted to fly in a generally clockwise directionaround the paths shown. In some embodiments, this unidirectional rule islifted in the event of an emergency. Alternatively, a 3D flying spacemay not necessarily have a permitted direction of flight.

Although the techniques described herein may be used with anyappropriate type of aircraft, the exemplary aircraft shown here in FIG.2 may be desirable in some applications for the following reasons. Theexemplary aircraft (202 and 206) are capable of performing a verticaltakeoff and landing and have a relatively small size. This may beattractive in urban and/or densely populated areas such as San Franciscobecause there is no need for a long runway in order to take off andland. The exemplary aircraft (202 and 206) also include floats (208 and210) which permit the aircraft to take off and land from water inaddition to land. For example, the 3D flying spaces shown in FIG. 1 arelocated entirely over water, not over land. Flying over water is saferthan flying over land (e.g., in the event of a crash or hard landing)and it may be easier to find open waterfront locations for takeoffs andlandings compared to finding open land/ground for that purpose.

The 3D flying spaces described above are merely exemplary and are notintended to be limiting. The following figures describe anotherembodiment of a 3D flying space.

FIG. 3A is a diagram illustrating a top view of an embodiment ofthree-dimensional (3D) flying spaces associated with layers. In theexample shown, two aircraft (300 a and 302 a) are flying over a lake(304). It is safer to fly over water than over ground, so in thisexample, 3D flying space 306 has a boundary that is completely overwater. To ensure that the two aircraft flying over the lake do notcollide with each other, the two aircraft are assigned to 3D flyingspaces in different layers (i.e., non-overlapping ranges of altitudes).The following figure shows this more clearly.

FIG. 3B is a diagram illustrating a side view of an embodiment ofthree-dimensional (3D) flying spaces associated with layers. In theexample shown, the first aircraft (300 b) is assigned to a 3D flyingspace (310) corresponding to an upper layer or top range of altitudesand the second aircraft (302 b) is assigned to a 3D flying space (312)corresponding to a lower layer or bottom range of altitudes. Thispermits the two aircraft to fly over the lake at the same time whilepreventing collisions between the two aircraft.

For compactness, the example shown here has no gap or buffer zonebetween 3D flying space 310 and 3D flying space 312. In someembodiments, there is some gap or buffer zone between adjacent layers tofurther ensure the safety of the pilots and those around them.

With 3D flying spaces (e.g., which are virtual and are not necessarilydemarcated in a physical manner in the sky using lasers, smoke, etc.),it would be helpful to display or otherwise provide informationassociated with a 3D flying space to the pilot and/or the location ofthe aircraft (e.g., so that the pilot does not inadvertently and/orunknowingly bump up against the boundaries of the 3D flying space). Thefollowing figure describes one example of such a process.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process to presentinformation associated with a three-dimensional (3D) flying space. Insome embodiments, the information is presented via a display in anaircraft which obeys or otherwise enforces the boundaries of a 3D flyingspace. In some embodiments, the information is presented via some otheruser interface including (but not limited to) the hand controls of theaircraft, directional arrows (e.g., indicating a suggestion direction ofcorrection), speakers, etc.

At 400, boundary information associated with a three-dimensional (3D)flying space is obtained. For example, boundary information whichdescribes the three-dimensional flying space may be received. 3D flyingspace 100 and 3D flying space 110 in FIG. 1 show examples of a 3D flyingspace from a top view. Cross-sectional areas 200 and 204 in FIG. 2 showexamples of a cross-sectional area of a 3D flying space. In general,information is obtained at 300 which tells the aircraft where it ispermitted to fly (i.e., inside its 3D flying space) and where it is notpermitted to fly (i.e., outside its 3D flying space).

In some embodiments, some segments or sections of the three-dimensionalflying space have one set of rules (e.g., about the permitted directionsof flight) and other segments or sections have different rules. Forexample, suppose that permitted route 100 in FIG. 1 instead had a “mainloop” with multiple, bidirectional entrances and exits (e.g., for morecompact routing and/or efficient use of space, as described above). Insome embodiments, the information received or otherwise obtained at step300 identifies which sections or parts of a 3D flying space have whatset of associated rules (e.g., some indication that a “one way onlyrule” only applies to the main loop of a 3D flying space).

At 402, location information associated with the aircraft is obtained.For example, this information may be received from a GPS system in theaircraft and may include the aircraft's latitude, longitude, andaltitude (i.e., a position or location within 3D space).

At 404, information is presented based at least in part on the boundaryinformation associated with the 3D flying space and the locationinformation associated with the aircraft. In some embodiments, theinformation presented is a warning (e.g., in advance of any automaticintervention by the aircraft to keep the aircraft in the 3D flyingspace) that the aircraft is getting too close to the boundary of a 3Dflying space. Various embodiments of this are described in more detailbelow where a variety of user interfaces (e.g., displays, speakers,force feedback hand controls, etc.) may be used to present or otherwisedisplay such a warning.

In some embodiments, the information presented is the boundaries of the3D flying space and/or the location of the aircraft. As will bedescribed in more detail below, a variety of user interfaces may be used(e.g., displays, speakers, etc.) and the information may be visualinformation (e.g., an icon or avatar representing the aircraft with theboundaries of the 3D flying space indicated) or audio information (e.g.,an audible message or announcement about the distance between theaircraft's current location and the boundary of the 3D flying space in aspecified or announced direction).

In some embodiments, information in addition to boundary information butalso associated with the 3D flying space is obtained at step 400 andpresented at step 404. For example, in FIG. 1, 3D flying space 100 has apermitted direction of flight where the aircraft is permitted to fly ina clockwise direction through the path shown but not in acounterclockwise direction. In some embodiments, step 400 includesreceiving information associated with a permitted direction of flight(e.g., clockwise) and that information is displayed at step 404 (e.g., adirection arrow). In some embodiments, a (e.g., section of) 3D flyingspace has a speed limit and that speed limit is obtained at step 400 andpresented at step 404. These are some examples and are not intended tobe limiting.

The following figure shows an example of a system which performs theprocess of FIG. 4.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of blocks in anaircraft associated with presenting information based at least in parton boundary information associated with a three-dimensional (3D) flyingspace and location information associated with the aircraft. In someembodiments, the steps described in FIG. 4 are performed by and/or usingthe blocks or modules shown here.

In this example, the boundary information associated with a 3D flyingspace is stored in memory 502. In various embodiments, the selection orassignment of a particular 3D flying space for a given aircraft may beperformed in a variety of ways. In some embodiments, there is someassignor or other device which assigns a 3D flying space to a particularaircraft and the 3D flying space information which is stored in 502 isobtained from such an assignor.

Alternatively, in some embodiments there is no assignor or otherauthority and each aircraft selects for themselves what their 3D flyingspace is. In some such embodiments, memory 502 stores a number ofpredefined 3D flying spaces associated with particular locations andlistens on a wireless channel for any aircraft which are already presentin the vicinity and which predefined 3D flying spaces those aircrafthave already claimed. For example, referring back to FIG. 1, theaircraft may know from its GPS system that it is on the San Franciscowaterfront and may therefore retrieve two predefined 3D flying spacesassociated with that area. In the example of FIG. 1, the aircraft hasits choice of either a first (predefined) 3D flying space (e.g., 100 inFIG. 1) or a second (predefined) 3D flying space since no other aircraftare present and all 3D flying spaces are free. In this example, theaircraft chooses to occupy the first 3D flying space (e.g., the outerloop 100 in FIG. 1) and therefore begins periodically transmitting abroadcast (e.g., over a wireless channel), indicating that it isoccupying the first 3D flying space.

Input device 504 (e.g., a joystick, an up-down thumbwheel, etc.) is usedto receive an input associated with flying or otherwise controlling anaircraft from a pilot. In some embodiments, an input device (504) isalso a user interface (508) via which information is presented to thepilot (e.g., aircraft is too close to the boundary of the 3D flyingspace). In various embodiments, the user interface is vibrational,includes force feedback, etc.

Location sensor (506) provides the location of the aircraft to flightcomputer 500 and in some embodiments is a GPS system. As describedabove, the flight computer (500) will respond to the input from thepilot, so long as the pilot's input or instructions do not cause theaircraft to leave the 3D flying space.

Using these inputs, the flight computer (500) generates two outputsignals: one or more control signals to one or more control surfaces(510) and information to present or otherwise display to the pilot(e.g., based on the 3D flying space, the location of the aircraft, etc.)via the user interface (508). For example, for multiple 202/206 in FIG.2, the only control surfaces are the thrust or rotational speed of theten rotors (e.g., there are no flaps which lift up/down, the rotors donot tilt, etc.). If the pilot (e.g., via the input device 504) were tosteer the aircraft toward the boundary of the 3D flying space, theflight computer (500) would generate control signals for the controlsurfaces (510) which would keep the aircraft in the 3D flying space(e.g., by ignoring the pilot's inputs via a joystick or thumbwheel, asor if needed). In some embodiments, the computer could also ignore inputin the invalid direction only (e.g., the 3D boundary could causemodified pilot input to the flight computer).

The flight computer (500) also generates information or signals to bepresented via user interface 508. In various embodiments, the userinterface may be a display which presents visual information (e.g., theboundaries of the 3D flying space, an icon or avatar of the aircraftshowing the position or location of the aircraft relative to the 3Dflying space, a permitted direction of flight, a speed limit, etc.), aspeaker which presents audio information (e.g., an audible warning whenthe aircraft gets too close to the boundary of a 3D flying space), and aforce feedback hand control (e.g., a force feedback joystick, a forcefeedback thumbwheel, etc.) which outputs more resistance or force as theaircraft gets closer and closer to the boundary of the 3D flying space.The following figures describe some exemplary user interfaces andexemplary presented information in more detail.

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a display which isconfigured to display an aircraft's position relative to the boundariesof a three-dimensional (3D) flying space. In the example shown, acutaway view of the cockpit is shown looking toward the front of themulticopter. For context, the cutaway view of the cockpit includes awindshield (600), seat (602), left armrest (604), right armrest (606),and footwell (608).

In this example, the pilot's left hand controls a single axis thumbwheel(610). The thumbwheel (610) is mounted to the (left) handgrip (612) onthe side or surface of the handgrip that faces into the cockpit. Thethumbwheel is spring centered so that the thumbwheel returns to thecentered position if the pilot releases the thumbwheel. When thethumbwheel is pushed up, the aircraft ascends. Conversely, when thethumbwheel is pushed down, the aircraft descends. The speed at which themulticopter ascends or descends corresponds to the degree or amount ofdisplacement experienced by the thumbwheel. Although these example showspecific hand controls, it is noted that these feedback techniques maybe adapted for any hand control.

The pilot's right hand controls a three-axis fingertip joystick (614). Afingertip joystick offers fingertip control and is generally smaller andoffers less resistance than a hand-controlled joystick (e.g., where thepilot's hand would wrap around a hand-controlled joystick). The firstaxis is a vertical (e.g., yaw) axis extending upward from the top of thejoystick where the joystick's knob or tip can be twisted about this axisin the clockwise direction or counterclockwise direction. Turning thetwistable knob of the joystick causes the multicopter to correspondinglyrotate about a vertical or yaw axis. The other two axes of the joystickare the x (e.g., roll) axis and y (e.g., pitch) axis (e.g., the pilotpushes the joystick in any direction and/or to any degree). Pushing thejoystick controls the multicopter's movement within a plane formed orotherwise defined by the roll axis and pitch axis. For example, pushingthe joystick forward causes the multicopter to fly forward and pullingthe joystick backward causes the multicopter to fly backward.

In this example, the windshield (600) includes a display (620 a) whichis configured to display the aircraft's position relative to a 3D flyingspace. Display 620 b shows a larger, more detailed view of the display.In this example, the 3D flying space is path-like where it is muchlonger than it is wider or taller and the cross-section of the exemplary3D flying space is rectangular (e.g., similar to rectangularcross-section 204 shown in FIG. 2). In one example, display 620 b may bepresent or otherwise display the information shown while an aircraft isflying through 3D flying space 100 or 3D flying space 110 in FIG. 1.

Within display 620 b, the position of cross-sectional boundary 622remains fixed (e.g., assuming that the cross-section does not change asthe aircraft travels along the exemplary path). Within that fixed frameof reference, an icon or avatar which represents the aircraft (624) isupdated based on the current position of the aircraft, relative to the3D flying space. In this view, the position of the aircraft's avatar isnot updated as the aircraft moves forwards or backwards along the path(e.g., along a longitudinal or roll axis) but is updated as the aircraftmoves up or down (e.g., along a vertical or yaw axis) and/or left orright (e.g., along a lateral or pitch axis).

In this example, color is used to indicate whether the aircraft'sposition, relative to the boundaries of the 3D flying space, is good orbad (this example assumes only two states). If the aircraft isrelatively centered and is therefore in a good position relative tocross-sectional boundary 622 (e.g., not crossing any of thresholds 220,222, 224, or 226 in FIG. 2), then all of the edges in boundary 622 aredisplayed in green (not shown). If the aircraft gets too close to theboundary on any side (e.g., any one of thresholds 220, 222, 224, or 226in FIG. 2 is crossed), then the too-close edge(s) is/are displayed inred whereas the good edges (i.e., at a safe or sufficient distance fromthe aircraft) are displayed in green. For example, for the state shownin display 620 b, the left border or edge of cross-sectional boundary622 would be displayed in red but the top, right, and bottom edges wouldbe green. Naturally, it is not necessary to use color to convey thisinformation and a variety of feedback or presentation techniques (e.g.,visible, audible, haptic, etc.) may be used.

In the state shown here, the aircraft is vertically centered within the3D flying space (e.g., it is equidistant from the top border as it isfrom the bottom border) but it is relatively close to the left-handborder of the 3D flying space. The pilot, if desired, may observe thisin the display (620 b) and use the joystick (614) to move the aircraftto the right so that the aircraft is better centered within the boundaryor cross section of the 3D flying space (622). Naturally, the positionof the aircraft's avatar (624) is updated within the display as thepilot steers or otherwise adjusts the position of the aircraft.

Depending upon the application (e.g., cost and/or weightconsiderations), the display may include other types of information(e.g., visual information). For example, in some embodiments, theaircraft includes a forward-facing camera and the display includes acurrent and/or real-time video feed of what the pilot sees (e.g., withthe aircraft avatar and boundary markers superimposed on the real-timevideo). Alternatively (e.g., to keep cost and/or weight down), thedisplay may not present any real-time video or views. Other informationsuch as remaining battery life, aircraft speed, wind speed, etc. mayalso be displayed via the display (620 a/620 b). In some embodiments, apath-like 3D flying space has a direction of flight (e.g., the path-like3D flying space is a one-way street). In some such embodiments, adisplay includes an arrow to indicate the (enforced) direction offlight.

As an aircraft flies through a 3D flying space, the boundaries maychange and the information presented may be varied accordingly. Forexample, suppose the aircraft enters a part of a 3D flying space wherethe cross-sectional area increases. To convey this, in one example, theaircraft's avatar (624) is shrunk so that the relative size of theaircraft's avatar compared to the size of the boundary 622 is smaller.

Or, suppose that the aircraft enters a part of a 3D flying space wherethe lateral or side boundaries open up but the top and bottom boundariesremain relatively the same (e.g., so that the 3D flying space is morelike the example of FIG. 3A and FIG. 3B). To convey this, in someembodiments, the side boundaries are not shown in the display until theaircraft gets closer to the relevant boundary. In some embodiments, atop view is presented or otherwise displayed to better convey the (e.g.,forward) distance between an aircraft and a boundary (e.g., as theaircraft flies forward towards the edge of boundary 306 in FIG. 3A).

In some embodiments, instead of using a display in the aircraft topresent the information, a virtual reality technique is used to presentor otherwise display information. In one example, a pilot wears avirtual reality (VR) headset which is used to display or otherwiseindicate the boundaries of the 3D flying space (e.g., superimposed onthe pilot's real-time field of view).

In some embodiments, a display or other user interface indicates orotherwise presents advance information about a part of the 3D flyingspace coming up. The following figure shows an example of this.

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of a display showing atop view of an aircraft's position relative to the boundaries of athree-dimensional (3D) flying space. In this example, the aircraft isflying along 3D flying space 100 or 3D flying space 110 in FIG. 1.Display 700 shows a top view with an icon or avatar for the aircraft(702) as well as the boundaries (704 a and 704 b) of the 3D flyingspace. With this information (e.g., including advance information), thepilot can see that the path is about to bend to the right. It may behelpful for the pilot to have advance notice about an upcoming change toa 3D flying space so that the pilot can time the turning of the aircraftto match the bend of the path so that the aircraft does not run into theboundary (e.g., 704 a or 704 b) of the 3D flying space.

In some embodiments (e.g., for cost and/or weight reasons), an aircraftdoes not include a display. The following figure describes someembodiments where other types of user interfaces are used.

FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of arrow indicators,speakers, and hand controls which are used to present information. Invarious embodiments, arrow indicators 800 are used for a variety ofpurposes. In one example, arrow indicators 800 are used to indicate adirection in which a pilot should move to correct the current positionof the aircraft relative to the boundaries of a 3D flying space, as orif needed. In this example, the aircraft is flying through a 3D flyingspace with a rectangular cross-section such as that shown in 204 in FIG.2. When the aircraft is relatively centered within the exemplaryrectangular cross-section (e.g., not crossing any of top threshold(220), bottom threshold (222), left threshold (224), or right threshold(226) in FIG. 2), none of corrective indicators 800 are illuminated orotherwise on.

However, if the aircraft were to cross the right threshold 226 in FIG. 2(as an example), the left arrow (802) would be illuminated, indicatingthat the aircraft is too close to the right edge or border of the 3Dflying space and should move to the left to correct for that. Or, if theaircraft were to cross the bottom threshold (222) in FIG. 2, then the uparrow 804 would be illuminated to suggest that the pilot move theaircraft upwards so that the aircraft is better centered within the 3Dflying space.

In this example, the hand controls (i.e., up-down thumbwheel 806 andjoystick 808) are not expected to be used at the same time. In fact,novice pilots may find it more comfortable to use only one hand controlat a time (e.g., so they can more easily focus on the response of theaircraft to just a single hand control). To avoid overwhelming a novicepilot with too complex of a correction and/or a correction suggestionwhich would require the simultaneous use of the thumbwheel (806) and thejoystick (808), in some embodiments only one of the four arrowindicators (800) is illuminated at any given time so that the pilot onlyhas to worry about manipulating one hand control to make the correctionsuggested. For example, a correction for the most egregious threshold orboundary crossing may be indicated first (e.g., illuminate up arrowcorrective indicator 804 first instead of illuminating both up arrow 804and left arrow 802). Then, once a sufficient correction has beenperformed along that axis, the smaller correction along the orthogonalaxis may be suggested (e.g., illuminate left arrow 802). Another way todescribe this is to say that a correction suggestion which would requirethe simultaneous use of two input devices (e.g., one manipulated by thepilot's right hand and the other by the pilot's left hand) is simplifiedor otherwise reduced to a correction suggestion which only requires theuse of a single input device (e.g., which only requires the use of theright hand or the left hand).

Similarly, it may be desirable to have at most four arrow indicators(800), as shown here. For example, if there were also an up-right arrow,a down-right arrow, a down-left arrow, and an up-left arrow, any ofthose correction suggestions would require the simultaneous use ofup-down thumbwheel 806 and joystick 808 which may be difficult fornovice pilots. More generally, in some embodiments, correctionsuggestions or indications which would require the simultaneous use ofmultiple hand controls are not presented.

In some embodiments, arrow indicators 800 are used to provide advanceinformation (e.g., about an upcoming section of the 3D flying space).For example, as described above, some path-like 3D flying spaces may bestraight in some sections and curved in the other sections. In someembodiments, an appropriate arrow indicator is used to indicate orotherwise suggest an upcoming maneuver so that the aircraft can stay oncourse and/or on track with the 3D flying space and not bump up againstthe boundaries.

The exemplary arrow indicators may be modified as desired (e.g., toconvey more and/or different information). For example, to preserve thereadability of the figure, only a single size or single length of arrowindicators is shown. In some embodiments there are different sized ordifferent lengths arrows (e.g., to indicate different degrees or amountsof correction or different degrees of turning up ahead). For example, ashorter and/or smaller arrow may be used to suggest a smaller amount ofcorrection or a smaller upcoming turn whereas a longer and/or largerarrow may be used to suggest a larger amount of correction or a sharperupcoming turn.

In some embodiments, audio information about the position of theaircraft relative to the boundaries of the 3D flying space is providedvia speaker 810. For example, while the aircraft is not in any danger ofcrossing the boundary of a 3D flying space (e.g., not crossing any ofthresholds 220, 222, 224, or 226 in FIG. 2), speaker 810 may be silentor may periodically indicate this (e.g., “The aircraft is not near anyboundaries of the 3D flying space.”). However, should any of thresholds220, 222, 224, or 226 in FIG. 2 be crossed, the speaker may issue anaudible suggestion or correction (e.g., “Please steer the aircraft tothe right.”). As before, the audible suggestions may be limited tosuggestions that only require the use of a single hand and/or singleinput device and which would not require the simultaneous use of twoinput devices (e.g., where both hands would be required).

In some embodiments, speaker 810 is used to provide audible advanceinformation. For example, “There is a 15 degree turn to the right comingup in 5 seconds. 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. Please turn to the right 15 degreesnow.”

In some embodiments, haptic information is provided via a hand control,such as thumbwheel 806 or joystick 808. For simplicity and ease ofexplanation, joystick 808 will be used as an example. Suppose thatjoystick 808 is a force feedback joystick where the joystick can providea variable amount of resistance when the joystick is displaced fromcenter. In some embodiments, force feedback is used to indicate orotherwise signal when an aircraft is getting too close to a boundary ofa 3D flying space. For example, while an aircraft is in the center ofcross-section 204 in FIG. 2, joystick 808 does not output any forcefeedback (e.g., the pilot feels no significant resistance whendisplacing the joystick from the center).

However, suppose the pilot (e.g., in a straight section of the 3D flyingspace) steers the aircraft to the left using joystick 808 such that leftthreshold 224 in FIG. 2 is crossed. The crossing of the left thresholdmay cause the joystick to output an increasing amount of force feedback(e.g., the joystick is pushing back against the pilot's hand, towardsthe center position) as the aircraft gets closer to the left edge ofcross-sectional boundary 204. This may signal to that pilot that theaircraft does not want the pilot to continue steering the aircraft tothe left. If the pilot were to push the joystick to the right (e.g., toreturn the aircraft to a more centered position), there would be littleor no force feedback from the joystick in that direction (e.g., becauseit is a desired or good direction).

Another way to describe this is that the input devices (e.g., thumbwheel806 and joystick 808) vary the haptic output (e.g., the force feedbackgenerated by the joystick) to give a kind of “spring-centered” feelingto the center of the tube or other 3D flying space (e.g., which dependsupon the position of the aircraft relative to or within the tube, andwhich does not depend upon the displacement of the joystick). This mayalso be used with tube or path-like 3D flying spaces to convey when atube or path has turned and the aircraft has not correspondingly turned(e.g., the pilot (e.g., inadvertently and/or unknowingly) keeps theaircraft on straight trajectory 106 in FIG. 1 but the path bends atcurve 108). Haptic information or feedback via an input device (e.g., ajoystick or thumbwheel) may be attractive because information (e.g.,about the boundaries of the tube or other 3D flying space) can beconveyed to the pilot without requiring split attention or visualdiversion.

In some embodiments, the amount of force feedback varies with thedistance between the aircraft and the (e.g., relevant) edge or boundary.For example, as the aircraft gets closer and closer to the edge orboundary, the amount of force feedback correspondingly increases. Theamount of force feedback is not (at least in this example) dependent onthe amount of joystick displacement. For example, for a given distancebetween the aircraft and a boundary of a 3D flying space, the sameamount of force or resistance output by the joystick (or other handcontrol) would be the same for a relatively small amount of joystickdisplacement (e.g., the aircraft is moving relatively slowly in theindicated direction) as well as for a relatively large amount ofjoystick displacement (e.g., the aircraft is moving relatively quicklyin the indicated direction).

The following figures describe the above examples more generally and/orformally in flowcharts.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process to presentinformation using a display. FIG. 9 is similar to FIG. 4 and forconvenience related steps are indicated using the same or similarreference numbers.

At 400 a, boundary information associated with a three-dimensional (3D)flying space is obtained, including by obtaining a boundary of the 3Dflying space. See, for example, FIGS. 1-3B which show some examples of3D flying spaces and their boundaries.

At 402 a, location information associated with the aircraft is obtained,including by obtaining a location of the aircraft. For example, theaircraft may include a GPS system and the aircraft's location isobtained from the GPS system.

At 404 a, information is presented based at least in part on theboundary information associated with the 3D flying space and thelocation information associated with the aircraft, including bypresenting, in a display, the boundary of the 3D flying space and anavatar which represents the aircraft at the location of the aircraft.See, for example, FIG. 6 where display 620 b presents aircraft avatar624 and cross-sectional boundary 622. This, for example, enables thepilot to see how close or far away they are from the boundary of the 3Dflying space. FIG. 7 shows a top view with aircraft icon 702 andboundaries 704 a and 704 b.

In some embodiments, additional information is also presented via thedisplay at step 404 a. For example, a speed limit associated with the 3Dflying space and/or a permitted direction of flight associated with the3D flying space may be presented in the display.

In some embodiments, the display is a virtual reality (VR) headset. Insome embodiments, the display is an integrated and/or touchscreendisplay in the aircraft.

In some embodiments, the display presents a warning when a distancebetween the location information and the boundary of the 3D flying spaceis less than (i.e., does not exceed) a threshold and presents no warningwhen the distance is greater than (i.e., exceeds) the threshold. Forexample, a border or background color may be red for the former andgreen for the latter.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process topresent information using a speaker, including a distance between theboundary of a three-dimensional (3D) flying space and the location of anaircraft. FIG. 10 is similar to FIG. 4 and for convenience related stepsare indicated using the same or similar reference numbers.

At 400 b, boundary information associated with a three-dimensional (3D)flying space is obtained, including by obtaining a boundary of the 3Dflying space.

At 402 b, location information associated with the aircraft is obtained,including by obtaining a location of the aircraft.

At 1000, a distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space and thelocation of the aircraft is determined. For example, in FIG. 6, thedistance between aircraft 624 and the left edge or border associatedwith boundary 622 may be determined.

At 404 b, information is presented based at least in part on theboundary information associated with the 3D flying space and thelocation information associated with the aircraft, including byannouncing, via a speaker, the distance between the boundary of the 3Dflying space and the location of the aircraft. For example, speaker 810may be used to make the announcement. In some embodiments, the distanceis only announced when the aircraft is close to the boundary of the 3Dflying space (e.g., because it may be less distracting to the pilot ifthe speaker is silent when the aircraft is not in any danger of leavingthe 3D flying space).

In some embodiments, some other information (e.g., in addition to thedistance between the boundary of the 3D flying space and the location ofthe aircraft, which is announced at step 404 b) may be presented audiblyusing a speaker (e.g., a speed limit and/or if a section of the 3Dflying space is one-way).

FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process topresent information using a speaker, including a correction direction.FIG. 11 is similar to FIG. 4 and for convenience related steps areindicated using the same or similar reference numbers.

At 400 c, boundary information associated with a three-dimensional (3D)flying space is obtained, including by obtaining a boundary of the 3Dflying space.

At 402 c, location information associated with the aircraft is obtained,including by obtaining a location of the aircraft.

At 1100, a distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space and thelocation of the aircraft is determined.

At 1102, the distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space andthe location of the aircraft is compared against a threshold. Forexample, in FIG. 2, this would correspond to determining if aircraft 206has crossed any of thresholds 220, 222, 224, or 226.

At 404 c, information is presented based at least in part on theboundary information associated with the 3D flying space and thelocation information associated with the aircraft, including by inresponse to the distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space andthe location of the aircraft being less than the threshold, suggesting,via a speaker, a correction direction which would cause the distancebetween the boundary of the 3D flying space and the location of theaircraft to increase. For example, when an aircraft is relativelycentered in a 3D flying space (as aircraft 206 is in FIG. 2 where noneof thresholds 220, 222, 224, or 226 is crossed), there may be nocorrection direction suggested via the speaker. However, should one ofthe thresholds be crossed (e.g., left threshold 224), then a correctiondirection may be suggested via the speaker (e.g., “Please move to theright”). Once the aircraft has moved away sufficiently (e.g., so thatthe threshold is no longer exceeded or crossed), the speaker may stopsuggesting the correction direction.

As described above, in some embodiments, a correction direction may besimplified, reduced, or otherwise constrained to be a correctiondirection which only requires the use of one hand and/or one inputdevice. For example, if the aircraft is too close to a top border andright border (and ideally should move down and to the left to beperfectly centered), only one of those directions would be suggested(e.g., only “Please move to the right” and not “Please move down and tothe right”). As described above, suggesting a correction which wouldrequire the simultaneous use of both hands may overwhelm a novice and/orinexperienced pilot.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment of a process topresent information using a speaker, including a correction direction.FIG. 12 is similar to FIG. 4 and for convenience related steps areindicated using the same or similar reference numbers.

At 400 d, boundary information associated with a three-dimensional (3D)flying space is obtained, including by obtaining a boundary of the 3Dflying space.

At 402 d, location information associated with the aircraft is obtained,including by obtaining a location of the aircraft.

At 1200, a distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space and thelocation of the aircraft is determined.

At 1202, the distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space andthe location of the aircraft is compared against a threshold.

At 404 d, information is presented based at least in part on theboundary information associated with the 3D flying space and thelocation information associated with the aircraft, including by inresponse to the distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space andthe location of the aircraft being less than the threshold, increasingan amount of force feedback output by a force feedback input device. Insome embodiments, the input device via which the direction suggestion ispresented at step 404 d includes one or more of the following: athumbwheel, a joystick, etc.

Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detailfor purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limitedto the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementingthe invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and notrestrictive.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system, comprising: a processor; and a memorycoupled with the processor, wherein the memory is configured to providethe processor with instructions which when executed cause the processorto: obtain boundary information associated with a three-dimensional (3D)flying space, including a boundary of the 3D flying space, wherein the3D flying space is defined by a center path and a cross section aboutthe path; obtain location information associated with an aircraft,including a location of the aircraft; determine a distance between theboundary of the 3D flying space and the location of the aircraft;compare the distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space and thelocation of the aircraft against a threshold; and present informationbased at least in part on the boundary information associated with the3D flying space and the location information associated with theaircraft, including by: presenting, in a display, the boundary of the 3Dflying space and an avatar representing the aircraft at the location ofthe aircraft, and in response to the distance between the boundary ofthe 3D flying space and the location of the aircraft not exceeding thethreshold, increasing an amount of force feedback output by a forcefeedback input device.
 2. The system recited in claim 1, wherein thecross section about the path defining the 3D flying space includes oneor more of the following cross sections: a circular cross section, anelliptical cross section, or a rectangular cross section.
 3. The systemrecited in claim 1, wherein the display includes one or more of thefollowing: a virtual reality headset, a touchscreen display, or adisplay integrated into the aircraft.
 4. The system recited in claim 1,wherein presenting the information further includes presenting, in thedisplay, a speed limit associated with the 3D flying space.
 5. Thesystem recited in claim 1, wherein presenting the information furtherincludes presenting, in the display, a permitted direction of flightassociated with the 3D flying space.
 6. The system recited in claim 1,wherein presenting the information further includes announcing, via aspeaker, the distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space andthe location of the aircraft.
 7. The system recited in claim 1, whereinpresenting the information further includes: in response to the distancebetween the boundary of the 3D flying space and the location of theaircraft not exceeding the threshold, suggesting, via a speaker, acorrection direction which would cause the distance between the boundaryof the 3D flying space and the location of the aircraft to increase. 8.A method, comprising: obtaining boundary information associated with athree-dimensional (3D) flying space, including a boundary of the 3Dflying space, wherein the 3D flying space is defined by a center pathand a cross section about the path; obtaining location informationassociated with an aircraft, including a location of the aircraft;determining a distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space andthe location of the aircraft; comparing the distance between theboundary of the 3D flying space and the location of the aircraft againsta threshold; and presenting information based at least in part on theboundary information associated with the 3D flying space and thelocation information associated with the aircraft, including by:presenting, in a display, the boundary of the 3D flying space and anavatar representing the aircraft at the location of the aircraft, and inresponse to the distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space andthe location of the aircraft not exceeding the threshold, increasing anamount of force feedback output by a force feedback input device.
 9. Themethod recited in claim 8, wherein the cross section about the pathdefining the 3D flying space includes one or more of the following crosssections: a circular cross section, an elliptical cross section, or arectangular cross section.
 10. The method recited in claim 8, whereinthe display includes one or more of the following: a virtual realityheadset, a touchscreen display, or a display integrated into theaircraft.
 11. The method recited in claim 8, wherein presenting theinformation further includes presenting, in the display, a speed limitassociated with the 3D flying space.
 12. The method recited in claim 8,wherein presenting the information further includes presenting, in thedisplay, a permitted direction of flight associated with the 3D flyingspace.
 13. The method recited in claim 8, wherein presenting theinformation further includes announcing, via a speaker, the distancebetween the boundary of the 3D flying space and the location of theaircraft.
 14. The method recited in claim 8, wherein presenting theinformation further includes: in response to the distance between theboundary of the 3D flying space and the location of the aircraft notexceeding the threshold, suggesting, via a speaker, a correctiondirection which would cause the distance between the boundary of the 3Dflying space and the location of the aircraft to increase.
 15. Acomputer program product, the computer program product being embodied ina non-transitory computer readable storage medium and comprisingcomputer instructions for: obtaining boundary information associatedwith a three-dimensional (3D) flying space, including a boundary of the3D flying space, wherein the 3D flying space is defined by a center pathand a cross section about the path; obtaining location informationassociated with an aircraft, including a location of the aircraft;determining a distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space andthe location of the aircraft; comparing the distance between theboundary of the 3D flying space and the location of the aircraft againsta threshold; and presenting information based at least in part on theboundary information associated with the 3D flying space and thelocation information associated with the aircraft, including by:presenting, in a display, the boundary of the 3D flying space and anavatar representing the aircraft at the location of the aircraft, and inresponse to the distance between the boundary of the 3D flying space andthe location of the aircraft not exceeding the threshold, increasing anamount of force feedback output by a force feedback input device. 16.The computer program product recited in claim 15, wherein the crosssection about the path defining the 3D flying space includes one or moreof the following cross sections: a circular cross section, an ellipticalcross section, or a rectangular cross section.
 17. The system recited inclaim 1, wherein the 3D flying space includes a plurality of segments,wherein each segment is defined by a center path from a first set ofcoordinates to a second set of coordinates with a cross section aboutthe center path.